Archive for the 'Film' Category



18
Jul

The Watchmen Trailer

There’s a lot I want to say about this, but instead I just keep watching it over and over again.

It’s absolutely perfect, taking iconic moments from the comic and turning them into movie magic.

There’s a nice shot by shot comparison here.

14
Jul

Hellboy II: Tell me something good

image I can review this movie in a single sentence: There are many of wonderful and magical things about Hellboy II, but unfortunately the story isn’t one of them.

There. Done. So long!

Or maybe I could go a bit beyond that and talk about how amazing the character designs are, and how impressive it is to see a film that is based around building something out of the elements of classic fantasy rather than the ridiculous mish-mash of maniacal horror villains that have served us as the basis of most non sci-fi genre films made in the last half century. After all, aren’t the monsters from Halloween, Friday the 13th, Nightmare on Elm Street and a hundred other modern horror films also fantasy characters? They’re not really real, that’s for sure. And yes, they’re homicidal maniacs, but in the end they’re cut from the same cloth as vampires, werewolves, trolls, and a hundred other things that have gone bump in the night for over a thousand years.

Hellboy II is different though. It’s menace comes out of the same tradition as Lord of the Rings. They’re creatures from a world that exists at a broken angle just outside of our own. Beasts rising out from the cracks in the mirror. On that level alone there are enough fresh ideas in this film to make it worth seeing, even if the story its trying to tell is weak, disjointed, and just plain broken.

Lawrence Miles, a most excellent writer, recently posted something about the new Doctor Who episodes that I think resonates perfectly with Hellboy II (and is probably worth a post all by itself):

Any CGI monster is by definition going to be regarded as a Special Effect rather than a natural part of the story. The advantage of a “real” monster, whether it’s a Dalek, a gasmask-zombie, or even a Muppet, is that it stops being bizarre after the first couple of minutes. The audience begins to treat it as a normal element of the story-world, and accepts it as a given fact, which means that we find the programme much more engaging. Whereas the point of a computer sprite will always be to make the viewer say “gosh, wow, look!”, and the result of this is usually a series of set-pieces in which the episode shows off the CGI as much as possible whether we care about it or not.

And with HB2 you get both practical and CGI creatures. The real-world creations walk, lumber, and stagger around. Even Hellboy himself is by and large a suit, with the actors face peering out from underneath the red paint, grinning with a set of large white teeth. Added into this group of heroes is Johan, a Prussian gasbag, whose containment suit costume is a prop of such gorgeous artistry that I often found myself simply admiring its hundreds of tiny details while the story fell to pieces around it. Beyond the director’s obvious understanding of the nature of fantasy, it’s that kind of attention to minutia that clearly makes Del Toro the right man to handle the Hobbit.

image It’s also used to build up the backbone of the story, with multiple emotional arcs being centered around the relationships between the different oddities inhabiting the story and the rest of the human race. Even the human characters are monsters to be shunned by the normal people. It’s a powerful idea, but like much of the film’s narrative, it’s only used as shorthand, and then discarded once its work is done.

The CGI spectacles are definitely eye-catching, with one big monster in particular reminding me of something straight of Miyazaki. It’s a simply breathtaking creation (even if its weak-point is a videogame trope straight out of the ending of Half-Life). But again, the narrative lets us down: When the villain chides Hellboy for wanting to kill it you’re right there with him, wondering why he would want do that to something so magnificent and grand. But if you take a second to think about it, you realize that it was the villain himself who unleashed it after our hero, commanding it to kill him. It’s a juicy moral dilemma that the film utterly avoids sinking its teeth into.

The movie’s gorgeous tapestry is riddled with hundreds of these little plot holes, leaving a film that delivers exceptional moments, but never bothers to earn them. Instead, when it wants you to feel something it simply holds you down and pours the emotions straight into your throat, like a bottle of emotional castor oil.

And oddly enough, maybe in the end you do feel a little bit better walking out of the theater than you did walking in. But it still leaves a bit of a bad taste in your mouth.

12
Jul

The Rebirth of Second Tier Sci-Fi

Even as we’re still reveling what seems to and endless stream of big budge genre movies, many of the major releases of the summer have already coming out, leaving a little breathing room for smaller pictures to start to get some attention. Lacking the big-money and big names stars of their celluloid cousins, these movies are traditionally schlock horror, monster movies, or cerebral crime pictures. Or at least they have been for the last few years. But I’ve noticed that there’s been a sudden resurgence in mid-budget science fiction films.

There have, of course, been these kinds of movies almost since the cameras have started turning. These are the films that supplied television with a constant stream of crap that led the way to the post-modern wonderland that we inhabit today. From the Saturday Matinee Movie, the Late Late Late Show, all the way to their final resting place on Mystery Science Theater 3000. But that wellspring seems to have dried up since the early 90s. Outside of a constant stream of terrible direct-to-video films appearing on the Sci-Fi channel our screens seem to have been devoid of the kind of mid-budget techno-action movie that used to be a staple of the cinematic underground. In some ways it was these “cult classics” that were responsible for their own demise, creating a generation of fans that elevated the genre movie to the top of the box office heap, and kept it there for the last three decades.

Of course, even after Star Wars, the 80s were a golden era of the sci-fi crapfest. Films like I Come in Peace, and Cyborg, kept Dolph Lundgren and Jean-Claude Van Damme employed for the last half of the decade.

They were some diamonds in the dirt as well. Films like The Hidden, and Near Dark are still worth watching today.

But the mid-budget sci-fi picture had vanished from the big screen as it became more and more commonplace on television. Did a world with Stargate, Farscape, Star Trek, Firefly, and Andromeda need a modern day equivalent of the Running Man? There were some exceptions, but they were few and far between, and all of them seem to star Christian Bale.

There’s something that I love about these films. Maybe it’s the way that their reach constantly, and shamelessly, outstrips their grasp. Or that they often mix highbrow ideas with lowbrow action.

Well despair no more. Because it seems like they’re back:

Vikings vs. Alien invaders? Led by an alien alien-hunter?  Seriously? Golan-Globus couldn’t come up with this kind of stuff. Also note the key ingredient of the second tier British actor, bringing some faux authority to the proceedings.

Paul W.S. Anderson, the director that the internet loves to hate, is also heading into the second tier sweepstakes. In a remake of Death Race, he mashes up the original movie with the Running Man to create a dystopian smash and crash picture. His film is actually coming out this summer:

If I had to pick a single movie that marks the beginning of the new trend I’d call it at Doomsday, directed by Neil Marshall. He’s gracefully made the transition from horror to sci-fi with a film that manages to try and shoehorn Outbreak and Mad Max into the same story. Bob Hoskins provides the fauxthority in this one:

But I’ve saved the best for last. When it comes to the apocalypse nobody stages one quite like Eastern Europe. Their dour negative attitude, and crumbled opulence is perfect for the mix of sturm and drang with a side of grand guignol. Consequently it’s a great place to shoot your apocalyptic epic on the cheap.

To that end, we have The Mutant Chronicles. Based on a roleplaying game, this film is poised to be so over the top that it leaves the rest of them in the dust. John Malkovich does the requisite slumming in this picture, proving that you don’t need to be English to burn gravitas:

 

Hopefully one or more of these films will be more than the sum of it’s parts, ushering us into a new age of glorious terribleness. It’s certainly a very good start.

10
Jul

Gotham Knights: Batman on Stilts

I’ve been looking forward to this new slice of animated Batman for a while now.  That’s for any number of reasons, including a long standing enthusiasm for anime, along with a hopeful enthusiasm over the idea of extending a film franchise through the use of secondary media, such as films and games.

The Matrix tried this trick first, throwing every variety of geek media at their Intellectual Property, including a canonical massively multiplayer game that managed to employee Laurence Fishburne just long enough to kill Morepheus for realz.

image Still, I was hoping Batman: Gotham Knight could be something more. After all, comic books are the foundry from which modern continuity worship was forged. So why not expand the world of the Batman film by getting some of the modern masters of Japanese animation to work with some top comic writers and make the magic happen? And hey, what if we through in the voice acting of Kevin Conroy, the man who has provided the premiere animated voice of the Batman for almost two decades? What could possibly go wrong?

The fact that the whole project falls flat on its face doesn’t seem to be anyone’s fault in particular. The synergy of all this talent that completely fails to occur, and it ends up dooming the whole thing to being a mediocre exercise at best. The dialog seems wooden, and miss-matched with the gorgeously trippy animation. The stories meander, clearly unable to take advantage of their connection to the film, leaving them to feel disconnected and tentative, if not downright silly. While you can see how this would work on the comic page, some of the vignettes end up being silly. And adding insult to injury, Kevin Conroy’s iconic interpretation of the Dark Knight seems poorly matched to the radical interpretations of the character designs.

It all feels a bit goofy, which, ironically, is exactly the emotion that Batman Begins managed to banish from its earnest interpretation.

As an appetizer Gotham Knights manages to be a little sweet and salty, but doesn’t do anything to whet your appetite for the cinematic main course that’s arriving in theaters next week.

30
Jun

James Bond gets a Quantum of Solace

I was talking to a friend of mine today about the new Bond trailer that was released today. My buddy is more than a decade younger than I am, and it was pretty clear for a generation that came of age in the 90s the crazy gadgets and glamorous gals didn’t have the same appeal when everyone has a cell phone in their pocket, and porn was marching into the mainstream.

Part of the problem is that Roger Moore was a fairly poor bond. By the mid eighties he had long outstayed his welcome, and was driving the franchise into the ground until it had become a sad parody of itself that was overripe for the kind of parody that launched the Austin Powers series.

Here’s a great video of Moore discussing how little he cares about the character, and it shows off just how far the whole thing had fallen:

Things picked up a bit by the time that GoldenEye came out, but reality was already outpacing the movie gadgets, and generally the Bond series was unable to generate any plots that didn’t have Bond, once again, running from location to location trying to intercept or stop packages as they were being shipped from one location to another.

Ever since the third film the character’s main job was to mess with FedEx, and failing to actually get the package, blow up the destination when he stumbled into it.

The actual spying and such were secondary to the “suave sophistication”, set pieces, and big bangs that the series leaned on when they didn’t have much of an actual plot. Ultimately Pierce Brosnan’s bond succumbed to this overwhelming sameness. The urge to improve the series remained however, and the last classic Bond film, “Die Another Day” became post-modern when the usual ridiculous montage of hot chicks became part of an interpretive dance representing the torture that James was undergoing while he was trapped in a North Korean jail:

But they couldn’t even hold it together for an entire move. After all the sturm und drang, the movie devolved into more of the same old thing once Bond managed to reach Hong Kong and the sexy arms of Halle Berry.

But with a new, leaner and definitely meaner Bond, played by Daniel Craig, Casino Royale, although not complete devoid of the cliches, definitely felt different. Perhaps revitalized by the more brutal nature of international politics in a post-9/11 world, and the success of the Bourne films, it had an actual edge, and gave us a Bond that is both effective and effected. The new film, Quantum of Solace, picks up minutes after the last one, and seems to be attempting to build on what the last one started. According to the interviews, they’ve even avoided the usual globe-trotting in favor of focusing on Bond and his problems. So, the big question they need to answer is, can they keep making Bond more interesting forty years after the film series launched?

The new trailer makes it seem as if the answer may be yes.




car insurance debt consolidation sport