Archive for May, 2008



14
May

Doctor Who - Who are you?

image It’s hard to be a fan of Doctor Who over the age of 25 without also being a meta observer of the strange and unique place that the show holds in the firmament of the modern Science Fiction show. Premiering in 1964, two years before Star Trek, the show ran continuously for over 20 years. It pioneered concept of the modern traveling show, with a character able to move through space and time so that he could appear in radically different locations each and every week. Originally this was intended to allow the BBC to use their vast historical wardrobe to create period dramas that far less constricted by actual history, and focused on action. That all collapsed with the arrival of the Daleks. Deeply-inhuman fascist monsters that took Britain by storm, both literally and figuratively, and sent the show into a deeply sci-fi, and gave nerds the first hit of meta-story and continuity that they so desperately crave.

??????image Then the show disappeared for twenty years, leaving the airwaves for a long trip through alternative media. These side journeys including a movie, a series of novels and radio-plays that kept the love alive. Then, in 2005, the show returned with a bang, picking up not quite where it left off, and becoming one of the top rated shows in England.

And it’s clearly not an American product, even if it has picked up a few tricks from serial soaps like Buffy. Unlike the clear stories told in American television, Doctor Who plays fast and loose with its own rules, going from hard SF to fantasy in the blink of an eye. It’s doubly odd when you consider that it manages to hew to it’s own continuity in what is essentially a single long story that stretches all the way from it’s original broadcast in 1964.

image Of course some of the unique features of the show was built into its structure early on. One is that the main character is not actually human. The main effect of the character’s inhumanity is that it often makes him uniquely British, allowing him to lecture and reprimand humanity as a whole rather than a single member of the species at a time.

That other outcome is a hero can completely change his face and personality.  Like everything else in the world of Doctor Who the specifics form when severely hurt, creating a dramatic way to for the show to change actors when the current actor is either losing popularity or simple feels the need to move on. So far ten actors have “officially” played the Doctor, with Paul McGann managing to turn his one shot appearance in the spin-off film into a veritable cottage industry.

I’ll admit that I’m personally fascinated by the character, but even more so with it’s seemingly endless ability to generate spin-offs, which I’ll discuss in more detail in a follow-up post.

14
May

Heroes of Old

An Italian artist named Donald Soffritti creates some images of Superheroes in their later years:

image image

Reminds me of the old Mad Magazines from the 50s.

image

09
May

No Speed, NO!

image It’s interesting to see how sometimes a metaphor can be more powerful than the literal idea. That looks like what we’re about to face this week, when Speed Racer, the story of a boy who’s really into amazing cars goes up against a man who’s lost his heart, and must cover himself in metal in order to find it again.

Looking at the reviews, especially this one, in the New York Times, it’s pretty obvious that things aren’t looking good for the new film from the Wachowskis. That’s not to say that reviews are always right, but sometimes you read line that perfectly captures your fears:

But at least those cars — including Speed’s Mach 5, faithfully replicated from the old cartoons — move. When it comes to storytelling, “Speed Racer” has nothing in common with its title. Not only does it surpass the grinding tedium of “The Matrix Revolutions,” but it does so with far less excuse.

But “Speed Racer” is about a boy driving a car, surely a subject that cries out for linearity, simplicity, velocity. Instead the first half-hour layers flashbacks with portentous foreshadowings, generating pointless confusion about who is doing what and why.

Yow.

As many times as people may tell you to “turn off your brains” I still find it almost unbearable when an action movie starts to drag. It doesn’t need to be wall to wall action, but it’s important that there’s something entertaining happening in between the thrill ride.  An audience needs a reason to care, and they need to have a stake in the outcome.

That said I still want to see this film at some point. I’m curious about the camera effects and the unique transitions.

06
May

Watching the Watchmen Video Journal #2: The Costumes

Here’s the second Watchmen video journal.

Lot’s of neat stuff packed in here if you’re a fan of the comic.

First one can be found here.

06
May

Iron Man: I’m so happy to be wrong

I was wrong. It turns out the summer of ‘08 has started out with a bang

My one sentence review for Iron Man is as follows:
This is the best possible summer blockbuster you could make about a guy in a hi-tech super suit.

imageI suppose there could be quibbles, there always are, but it’s really an amazing movie, managing to keep to core premise and internal logic. But more than all of that the film has a tone that it stays true to as well.  It has a sense of playfulness that infuses even the most serious moments, and Robert Downey is a master at the self-effacing put-down, managing to make fun of himself and everyone else around him at the same time. That means Tony Stark is kind of a jerk, but he’s our kind of jerk, an American jerk. And there’s a moment when he first appears in public as Iron Man where he proves that for all his faults he is a genuine hero. I’m a sucker for that kind of stuff, and the film really plays it up. I’m looking forward to seeing it again, and seeing if it holds up on a second viewing.

It’s a good start to the year, and sets a high water mark for the other big summer films that are following it up.




car insurance debt consolidation sport