I think they’re trying hard, but as I’ve said before, it may be impossible to make a great hulk move.
The monster CG looks pretty poor as well, which isn’t going to help.
I think they’re trying hard, but as I’ve said before, it may be impossible to make a great hulk move.
The monster CG looks pretty poor as well, which isn’t going to help.
I’ve got something to tell you, and you aren’t going to like it:
There’s a really good chance Iron Man isn’t going to be as good as you think it is.
No, I haven’t seen it yet. Call it a gut feeling.
But even if it’s just okay doesn’t mean it won’t be fun, or you won’t have a good time. It just may not be satisfying in the way that a truly great movie can be. And that’s the other thing I have to tell you:
It isn’t supposed to be.
Movie blockbusters can be entertaining, and a great way to spend a few hours in the dark. Astounding sums of money are spent to make sure that you are well entertained in an optimized manner. But the goal isn’t about being great, it’s about being just good enough. And maybe just a little bit better then that, if you’re lucky. But they still have to be the kind of thing you can wrap a nice, safe, advertising campaign around.
Sure, every few years there’s an X-Men 2, Batman Begins, or Fellowship of the Ring that manages to surprise you with a good solid story lurking amongst the twisted metal and flying dinosaurs and/or robots. But that’s the exception and not the rule. And even then there’s invariably the let-down that comes when you watch it again on DVD and realize that perhaps it wasn’t as good as you remembered, and maybe you are still capable of being suckered in with whiz-bang effects and hot-chicks in leather-spandex short shorts.
Suckers.
And then there are the bombs. Big budget disasters like the The Chronicles of Riddick, or Superman Returns. Films that you leave wondering just where everything went so very, very wrong. Maybe they tried to break out of the mold. Or, what’s worse is that maybe they tried to be exactly what they were, and they failed anyway.
Either way, when you spend one hundred fifty million dollars or more, your first order of business is to make that money back. You need to be something for everyone rather than the right thing for someone. And so we get these sleek entertainment machines, designed to give everyone who sees them a consistent entertainment experience; the feeling of something different while being pretty much the same thing every time. A video hypodermic of pre-measured fun delivered directly to your cerebral cortex. A highly clinical procedure where the nurse is played by Jessica Alba.
But like I said, I haven’t seen the movie yet. Maybe this time I’m wrong. Maybe this time it’ll be perfect.
In case you somehow missed it over the weekend, Pan’s Labyrinth and Hellboy director director, Guillermo Del Toro, is packing his bags and moving to New Zealand to start work on The Hobbit films.
Record needle scratching noise.
FILMS!?
Del Toro’s moving to New Zealand for the next four years to work with Jackson and his Wingnut and WETA production teams. He’ll direct the two films back to back, with the sequel which will deal with the 60-year period between “The Hobbit” and “The Fellowship of the Ring,” the first of the “Lord of the Rings” trilogy.
Yes indeed, there will be two films. While the plot of the first is pretty clearly going to be directly from the book, the second one, so rumors state, will be a semi-original creation cobbled together from the copious material created by Tolkein and his son. Until we get a more official name for this movie, I’m going to refer to it as Hobbit Milk.
Del Toro has proven that he can create strong original fantasy material when given the chance, so I’m hoping that we’ll see something worthwhile come out of this collaboration.
And as we all know, Hobbit milk is always best when fresh from the Baggins.
UPDATE:
There’s some interesting tidbits to be found with Del Toro in this interview on TheOneRIng.net:
Fans are all abuzz about ‘The Second Film’, can you tell some of your plans for it?
GDT: You know, I traveled to New Zealand just a little while ago, and one of the main reasons for going was to sit down and talk about the second film. ‘The Hobbit’, the book, is really one self-contained film, so for the second movie we sat down and worked it out. When we did this we got really excited because this second film is not a ‘tag on’, it’s not ‘filler’, it’s an integral part of telling the story of those 50 years of history lost in the narrative. There will be certain things that we will see from the first movie but from a different point of view, but it will feel like a volume, in the 5 volumes of the entire story. It will not feel like a bridge, I’ve been hearing it called ‘a bridge film’, it’s not, it’s an integral chapter of the story, and I think we’re all on the same page.
Cracked online has run an article breaking down the 8 Pointless Laws All Comic Book Movies Follow. Much like the old magazine it’s “heh-heh” rather than “haw-haw” funny, and works a little too hard trying to make hard and fast rules that don’t always work, but law #8 is the one that got me thinking:
#8. The First Film Requires a Tedious Origin Story
For some unknown reason, tradition states that the first movie must consist largely of something no one in the audience paid to see: The superhero as he lived before he could do any cool superhero stuff.
Other genres don’t feel the need to do this; Die Hard didn’t spend the first half of the movie with John McClane taking target practice, Rambo didn’t spend an hour showing Rambo in basic training. Why can’t we just jump in?
Instead we have to watch Peter Parker struggling as a photographer, and Bruce Banner quietly working as a scientist, as if we must first appreciate the tedium of their regular lives before we get to see them jump off an exploding building.
Which isn’t true for any number of reasons. First and foremost is that almost every action movie of any stripe likes to show us what the main character is like before events beyond their control turn them into the hero. John McClane’s problems with his wife for example, or Rambo as a simple drifter before the eeeevil local law enforcement forces him to reveal that underneath the homeless exterior lies a well oiled fighting machine created by our own government!
But one thing that makes Superheroes super is that they have powers that are outside of what can be explained away simply by a little suspension of disbelief. So, if you’re superhuman then the audience would like to know how you got that way, and the writer would like to use that to create some cool thematic resonance, if that’s okay with you..
Setting up the powers to mimic emotions is a trick that’s been used ever since Stan Lee created the Fantastic Four back in the sixties, and the one that put Marvel on the map: The superheroes external transformation is their “old” inner-self suddenly appearing on the outside, and that allows them to become someone better within.
Look at the FF: Sue gains newfound confidence from her invisibility, Ben Grimm gets in touch with his emotions after becoming a man of stone, Johnny controls his “fiery temper” by learning to master his flaming body, and Reed Richards learns to control his brilliant (but unfocused) mind by learning to control his “out of control” body, and in the process becomes a true leader.
And when it works, it works well. Why are we looking forward to seeing Iron Man this summer? Just watch the trailer again. We know that Tony Stark is a man with an iron heart. And when his human heart is damaged, he learns compassion for his fellow man by becoming encased in steel.
Their origin stories are what makes these ridiculous characters acceptable and dramatic. It gives them an emotional motivation as well. Spiderman and Batman are out there trying to change the world in order to right the wrongs that were committed against the people that they loved. In Spiderman’s case the accident came after he gained his powers, in Batman’s it drove him to become a man capable of superhuman acts. But what fun would it be if we never saw what it is that drives them?
Latest Comments
Rand, John, Andrew Mayer, Elton
Ray Mccormick, Wes
patrick
Scott
Wes